Gregory F. Heerdink v. Dawn A. Osborne - (Concurring Opinion)

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Gregory F. Heerdink v. Dawn A. Osborne - (Concurring Opinion)

DecidedSeptember 24, 2024

DocketM2023-00816-COA-R3-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Gregory F. Heerdink v. Dawn A. Osborne - (Concurring Opinion) (Gregory F. Heerdink v. Dawn A. Osborne - (Concurring Opinion)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gregory F. Heerdink v. Dawn A. Osborne - (Concurring Opinion), (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

09/24/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 7, 2024 Session

GREGORY F. HEERDINK V. DAWN A. OSBORNE, ET AL.

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bedford County No. 32511 J.B. Cox, Chancellor

No. M2023-00816-COA-R3-CV

ANDY D. BENNETT, J., concurring. CARMA DENNIS MCGEE, J., joins.

I believe that the majority opinion accurately reflects existing law. Therefore, I concur. I write separately to express my concern that the existing law on voluntary nonsuits as outlined in this opinion allows a plaintiff to avoid sanctions for his bad actions taken before the nonsuit. In my opinion, defendant Osborne had at least an inchoate right to receive an undetermined amount of attorney’s fees based on the trial court’s order that “the Plaintiff should be ordered to pay all of each Defendant’s attorney’s fees associated with Plaintiff’s delays, including attendance at prior hearings on Motions to Withdraw, today’s hearing and all preparations for any such hearings.” The sanction was ordered. Only the amount was yet to be determined. A voluntary nonsuit should not allow Plaintiff to escape responsibility for his actions or to prevent Osborne from being properly compensated for Plaintiff’s wrongdoing.

/s/ Andy D. Bennett ANDY D. BENNETT, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

09/24/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 7, 2024 Session

GREGORY F. HEERDINK V. DAWN A. OSBORNE, ET AL.

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bedford County No. 32511 J.B. Cox, Chancellor

No. M2023-00816-COA-R3-CV

ANDY D. BENNETT, J., concurring. CARMA DENNIS MCGEE, J., joins.

I believe that the majority opinion accurately reflects existing law. Therefore, I concur. I write separately to express my concern that the existing law on voluntary nonsuits as outlined in this opinion allows a plaintiff to avoid sanctions for his bad actions taken before the nonsuit. In my opinion, defendant Osborne had at least an inchoate right to receive an undetermined amount of attorney’s fees based on the trial court’s order that “the Plaintiff should be ordered to pay all of each Defendant’s attorney’s fees associated with Plaintiff’s delays, including attendance at prior hearings on Motions to Withdraw, today’s hearing and all preparations for any such hearings.” The sanction was ordered. Only the amount was yet to be determined. A voluntary nonsuit should not allow Plaintiff to escape responsibility for his actions or to prevent Osborne from being properly compensated for Plaintiff’s wrongdoing.

/s/ Andy D. Bennett ANDY D. BENNETT, JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gregory F. Heerdink v. Dawn A. Osborne - (Concurring Opinion), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-f-heerdink-v-dawn-a-osborne-concurring-opinion-tennctapp-2024.