Gregory Bernard Washington v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 16, 2022
Docket05-22-00479-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gregory Bernard Washington v. the State of Texas (Gregory Bernard Washington v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory Bernard Washington v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order entered November 16, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00479-CR

GREGORY BERNARD WASHINGTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1875904-H

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due by August 18, 2022. After twice

extending the time, we ordered appellant’s brief to be filed by October 31, 2022.

To date, appellant has failed to do so.

So that this appeal can proceed, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a

hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the

trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine

whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the

hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza

v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If

appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be

necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of

new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which

shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Tina

Yoo Clinton, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No.1, and to counsel for all

parties.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above

order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when

the Court finds it appropriate to do so.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gregory Bernard Washington v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-bernard-washington-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.