Gregory Bean v. State
This text of Gregory Bean v. State (Gregory Bean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In two points of error, appellant contends his rights to due process and due course of law were violated when the district court imposed sentence without conducting a separate punishment hearing at which appellant could present evidence. See Issa v. State, 826 S.W.2d 159, 161 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Tex. Const. art. I, §§ 10, 19. This complaint was not preserved for review because appellant neither objected at the revocation hearing nor moved for a new trial on this ground. Gober v. State, 917 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Tex. App.--Austin 1996, no pet.).
The points of error are overruled and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Marilyn Aboussie, Justice
Before Chief Justice Yeakel, Justices Aboussie and Jones
Affirmed
Filed: August 31, 1998
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gregory Bean v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-bean-v-state-texapp-1998.