Gregory Alonza Wright v. Judge Myers Judge R. Gray Sumter County Family Court

Fourth Circuit

Gregory Alonza Wright v. Judge Myers Judge R. Gray Sumter County Family Court

59 F.3d 169, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23122, 1995 WL 371051

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 20, 1995·No. 95-1024·Published

Opinion

59 F.3d 169
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Gregory Alonza WRIGHT, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Judge MYERS; Judge R. GRAY; Sumter County Family Court,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-1024.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.

Gregory Alonza Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Myers, No. CA-94-3085-3-17-B (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 169
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Gregory Alonza WRIGHT, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Judge MYERS; Judge R. GRAY; Sumter County Family Court,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-1024.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.

Gregory Alonza Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Myers, No. CA-94-3085-3-17-B (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Gregory Alonza Wright v. Judge Myers Judge R. Gray Sumter County Family Court, 59 F.3d 169, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23122, 1995 WL 371051 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

59 F.3d 169 (Gregory Alonza Wright v. Judge Myers Judge R. Gray Sumter County Family Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.