Gregory Allen DeRutte v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2015
Docket09-14-00228-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gregory Allen DeRutte v. State (Gregory Allen DeRutte v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory Allen DeRutte v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00228-CR ____________________

GREGORY DERUTTE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 287595 ________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed June

24, 2014. The reporter’s record was due on October 6, 2014, but has not been

filed. The court reporter notified our Court on July 9, 2014, and October 7,

2014, that no payment arrangements had been made for preparation of the

reporter’s record. A notice was sent to the pro se appellant that the case was

being submitted on the clerk’s record alone and the brief was due to be filed on 1 November 7, 2014. The Court granted a second motion for extension of time to

file appellant’s brief which was due to be filed on or before February 6, 2015,

with the notation FINAL EXTENSION. On February 13, 2015, the appellant

was notified that the brief and a motion for extension of time to file the brief

have not been filed. Although a response from appellant to our late notice was

due by February 23, 2015, the brief has not been filed.

We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a

hearing attended by a representative of the State and the appellant. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.8(b)(2). If the appellant is not incarcerated, but fails to appear at the

hearing after having been notified to do so, or after reasonable attempts to notify

him have been made, then the trial court may enter a finding that appellant no

longer desires to pursue the appeal and send said finding to this Court. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.8(b)(4). If the appellant is present for the hearing, we direct the trial

court to determine whether or not appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If

appellant desires to pursue his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine

why the brief of the appellant has not been filed, whether appellant has retained

counsel who has abandoned the appeal, and whether good cause exists to appoint

counsel because the appellant is indigent and unrepresented by counsel. See Tex.

2 Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 1.051(d)(1) (West Supp. 2014). If the trial court

determines that appellant wants to pursue the appeal, the trial court shall

determine whether appellant is entitled to a free reporter’s record because he is

unable to pay or give security for the appellate record. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2.

The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court

judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The court reporter’s record of

the hearing and the clerk’s record containing the recommendations of the trial

court judge are to be filed on or before March 27, 2015.

ORDER ENTERED February 26, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gregory Allen DeRutte v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-allen-derutte-v-state-texapp-2015.