Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 20, 2011
Docket13-09-00209-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. (Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-09-00209-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

GREGORY A. BEAVERS, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC., Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on April 23, 2009, due to the bankruptcy of

one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. ' 362; see generally TEX. R. APP. P. 8.

The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by

parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. The parties request that this Court dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining

Company, Inc. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to

dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal of all claims

asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party

incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court

will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 20th day of October, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-a-beavers-v-southwestern-refining-company--texapp-2011.