Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc.
This text of Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. (Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00209-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
GREGORY A. BEAVERS, ET AL., Appellants,
v.
SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC., Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This appeal was abated by this Court on April 23, 2009, due to the bankruptcy of
one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. ' 362; see generally TEX. R. APP. P. 8.
The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by
parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. The parties request that this Court dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining
Company, Inc. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to
dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1(a). The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal of all claims
asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., is hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party
incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court
will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's
request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 20th day of October, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gregory A. Beavers v. Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-a-beavers-v-southwestern-refining-company--texapp-2011.