Gregorio T. ex rel. Jose T. v. Wilson

54 F.3d 599
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 1995
DocketNos. 95-55186, 95-55188, 95-55191 and 95-55192
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 F.3d 599 (Gregorio T. ex rel. Jose T. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregorio T. ex rel. Jose T. v. Wilson, 54 F.3d 599 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

These appeals challenge the district court’s preliminary injunction against implementation and enforcement of sections 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 of Proposition 187, a California voter initiative enacted at the November 8,1994 general election. Appellants have moved to consolidate and expedite the appeals, and appellee League of United Latin American Citizens has moved to stay them. For the reasons stated below, we grant appellants’ motions and deny appellee’s.

28 U.S.C. § 1657 and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-3 give priority to preliminary injunction appeals. In addition, recently adopted Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 (effective July 1,1995) automatically expedites briefing and decision in preliminary injunction appeals. Appellants have requested that Rule 3-3 govern this appeal. The request is granted.

In reviewing a preliminary injunction, we will consider only whether the district court relied on an erroneous legal premise or abused its discretion. See Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press International, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982). Extensive briefing of the merits of the underlying case is therefore unwarranted. Accordingly, the parties shall brief the issues in light of the standards articulated in Sports Form.

These appeals are consolidated and expedited as follows. Appellants shall file one consolidated opening brief by. May 18, 1995. All appellees shall file one consolidated answering brief by June 8, 1995. Appellants may file an optional reply brief by June 15, 1995. The length of briefs shall be governed by Ninth Circuit Rule 28-3. Service and filing of briefs shall be by hand delivery or overnight mail. No extensions of time, oversized briefs or amicus curiae briefs will be permitted.

This panel will retain jurisdiction over the merits of these appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F.3d 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregorio-t-ex-rel-jose-t-v-wilson-ca9-1995.