Gregorio Salgado v. Eric Holder, Jr.

436 F. App'x 751
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 2011
Docket09-73913
StatusUnpublished

This text of 436 F. App'x 751 (Gregorio Salgado v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregorio Salgado v. Eric Holder, Jr., 436 F. App'x 751 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gregorio Reyes Salgado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Sal-gado’s conviction for possession of marijuana for sale in violation of California Health & Safety Code § 11359 constitutes an aggravated felony as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). See id. 975-76 (possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony). Salgado is therefore statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rendon v. Mukasey
520 F.3d 967 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 F. App'x 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregorio-salgado-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.