Gregor v. State

894 So. 2d 1090, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3215, 2005 WL 562751
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 2005·No. No. 5D03-4173·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, Stuart John Gregor pled nolo contendere to the charge of carrying a concealed firearm, reserving the right to appeal. We affirm. The trial court correctly concluded that the police had a reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry1 stop based on information regarding Gregor’s possession of the firearm, which came from a “citizen informant” rather than an “anonymous informant.” See State v. Maynard, 783 So.2d 226 (Fla.2001).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregor v. State, 894 So. 2d 1090, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3215, 2005 WL 562751 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

894 So. 2d 1090 (Gregor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Maynard
783 So. 2d 226 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)