Gregoire v. Pollock

Supreme Court of Florida

Gregoire v. Pollock

262 So. 2d 679, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3766

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 17, 1972·No. No. 41449·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court because of conflict with Beasley v. Wolf, 151 So.2d 679 (Fla.App.3rd, 1963). We issued the writ and have heard argument of [680] the parties. Now, after hearing argument and upon further consideration of the briefs and record in the case, we conclude that the apparent conflict has been dispelled, and that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court because of conflict with Beasley v. Wolf, 151 So.2d 679 (Fla.App.3rd, 1963). We issued the writ and have heard argument of [680] the parties. Now, after hearing argument and upon further consideration of the briefs and record in the case, we conclude that the apparent conflict has been dispelled, and that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Gregoire v. Pollock, 262 So. 2d 679, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3766 (Fla. 1972).

Pincite

262 So. 2d 679 (Gregoire v. Pollock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related