Gregoire v. Allard
This text of 152 A. 489 (Gregoire v. Allard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with the principles which were examined at length in McCurdy v. Flibotte, 83 N. H. 143, and which were recognized and applied in Herschensohn v. Weisman, 80 N. H. 557 and Lemire v. Pilawski, 77 N. H. 116, defendant’s exceptions must be overruled. The defendant’s answer to the question of the witness, in either of the forms which were findable upon the evidence, clearly imported an admission of excessive speed. It is difficult to see how this admission could, under the circumstances, have been separated from the reference to insurance, but however this may be, it is plain that the trial court was not asked to make the attempt and defendant’s general exceptions are therefore unavailing. McCurdy v. Flibotte, supra.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 A. 489, 84 N.H. 473, 1930 N.H. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregoire-v-allard-nh-1930.