Greggs v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Greggs v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

177 So. 3d 1287, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17709, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2619

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 2015

DocketNo. 1D15-1390

StatusPublished

This text of 177 So. 3d 1287 (Greggs v. Florida Commission on Offender Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greggs v. Florida Commission on Offender Review, 177 So. 3d 1287, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17709, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2619 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a parole-eligible prisoner, argues the circuit court erred in dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus in which he challenged a decision of the Florida Parole Commission but inadvertently listed the Department of Corrections as the respondent in the style of the case. Rather than dismissing the petition, appellant argues the court should have substituted the Commission as the respondent, as requested by appellant and the Department. The Commission correctly concedes error. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.360(c)(1). Thus, we reverse and remand with instructions to substitute the Commission as the respondent.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WOLF, BILBREY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a parole-eligible prisoner, argues the circuit court erred in dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus in which he challenged a decision of the Florida Parole Commission but inadvertently listed the Department of Corrections as the respondent in the style of the case. Rather than dismissing the petition, appellant argues the court should have substituted the Commission as the respondent, as requested by appellant and the Department. The Commission correctly concedes error. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.360(c)(1). Thus, we reverse and remand with instructions to substitute the Commission as the respondent.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WOLF, BILBREY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 So. 3d 1287, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17709, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greggs-v-florida-commission-on-offender-review-fladistctapp-2015.