Greggory Lloyd Lobato v. State of Iowa

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Greggory Lloyd Lobato v. State of Iowa

DecidedApril 15, 2026

Docket25-0753

StatusPublished

This text of Greggory Lloyd Lobato v. State of Iowa (Greggory Lloyd Lobato v. State of Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greggory Lloyd Lobato v. State of Iowa, (iowactapp 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA _______________

No. 25-0753 Filed April 15, 2026 _______________

Greggory Lloyd Lobato, Applicant–Appellant, v. State of Iowa, Respondent–Appellee. _______________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Monona County, The Honorable Jeffrey A. Neary, Judge. _______________

AFFIRMED _______________

Tiffany Kragnes, West Des Moines, attorney for appellant.

Brenna Bird, Attorney General, and Timothy M. Hau, Assistant Attorney General, attorneys for appellee. _______________

Considered without oral argument by Tabor, C.J., Langholz, J., and Telleen, S.J. Opinion by Langholz, J.

1 LANGHOLZ, Judge.

A jury convicted Greggory Lobato of domestic-abuse assault, third offense—a class “D” felony. See Iowa Code § 708.2A(1), (4) (2022). He then pleaded guilty to a second charge of domestic-abuse assault, third offense, for another incident with the same victim as part of a global plea agreement negotiated by his same defense counsel. He did not appeal his convictions. Instead, he applied for postconviction relief, arguing that his counsel was ineffective throughout the representation. And after a short bench trial at which Lobato called only one witness—himself—the district court found that Lobato failed to prove his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims and denied him postconviction relief.

Lobato now appeals. But on our de novo review, we agree with the district court that Lobato has failed to show that his counsel breached any essential duty. So his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims fail. See Smith v. State, 7 N.W.3d 723, 725–26 (Iowa 2024); Sothman v. State, 967 N.W.2d 512, 522–23 (Iowa 2021). Because a full opinion would neither give the parties better reasoning than they have already received from the district court nor advance development of the law, we affirm with this memorandum opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(d), (e).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA _______________

No. 25-0753 Filed April 15, 2026 _______________

Greggory Lloyd Lobato, Applicant–Appellant, v. State of Iowa, Respondent–Appellee. _______________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Monona County, The Honorable Jeffrey A. Neary, Judge. _______________

AFFIRMED _______________

Tiffany Kragnes, West Des Moines, attorney for appellant.

Brenna Bird, Attorney General, and Timothy M. Hau, Assistant Attorney General, attorneys for appellee. _______________

Considered without oral argument by Tabor, C.J., Langholz, J., and Telleen, S.J. Opinion by Langholz, J.

1 LANGHOLZ, Judge.

A jury convicted Greggory Lobato of domestic-abuse assault, third offense—a class “D” felony. See Iowa Code § 708.2A(1), (4) (2022). He then pleaded guilty to a second charge of domestic-abuse assault, third offense, for another incident with the same victim as part of a global plea agreement negotiated by his same defense counsel. He did not appeal his convictions. Instead, he applied for postconviction relief, arguing that his counsel was ineffective throughout the representation. And after a short bench trial at which Lobato called only one witness—himself—the district court found that Lobato failed to prove his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims and denied him postconviction relief.

Lobato now appeals. But on our de novo review, we agree with the district court that Lobato has failed to show that his counsel breached any essential duty. So his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims fail. See Smith v. State, 7 N.W.3d 723, 725–26 (Iowa 2024); Sothman v. State, 967 N.W.2d 512, 522–23 (Iowa 2021). Because a full opinion would neither give the parties better reasoning than they have already received from the district court nor advance development of the law, we affirm with this memorandum opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(d), (e).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Greggory Lloyd Lobato v. State of Iowa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greggory-lloyd-lobato-v-state-of-iowa-iowactapp-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack