Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts, Inc.

884 A.2d 247, 584 Pa. 435, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1916

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 8, 2005·No. Petition No. 297 EAL 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of September 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED limited to the following issue:

In a products liability suit brought against the manufacturer or supplier of a product containing asbestos, to survive summary judgment must the plaintiff show frequent use of, and regular close proximity to, the product, even if the plaintiff presents direct evidence of inhalation?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of September 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED limited to the following issue:

In a products liability suit brought against the manufacturer or supplier of a product containing asbestos, to survive summary judgment must the plaintiff show frequent use of, and regular close proximity to, the product, even if the plaintiff presents direct evidence of inhalation?

Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts, Inc., 884 A.2d 247, 584 Pa. 435, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1916 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

884 A.2d 247 (Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related