Gregg v. State
This text of 127 So. 3d 700 (Gregg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion. We affirm. The claims are untimely and successive. See Fla..R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); Parks v. State, 101 So.3d 1265, 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“Defendant’s motion did not present any valid exceptions to the time limitations under the rule.... Further, Defendant’s motion was successive as the claims could have been raised in one of his previous motions.”) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1243-44 (Fla.2004)).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 So. 3d 700, 2013 WL 6081810, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregg-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.