Gregg v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gregg v. State

900 So. 2d 758, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6525, 2005 WL 1026738

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gregg v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1822 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 2005·No. No. 4D03-4261·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Although Gregg was not fully advised of his Miranda right to have counsel present during questioning, this challenge was not raised in the trial court. Therefore, the issue was not preserved. See Phillips v. State, 877 So.2d 912 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We have not addressed Gregg’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to raise this issue, leaving it to be raised by a motion for post-conviction relief. As to other issues raised, we find no reversible error or abuse of discretion.

FARMER, C.J., STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Although Gregg was not fully advised of his Miranda right to have counsel present during questioning, this challenge was not raised in the trial court. Therefore, the issue was not preserved. See Phillips v. State, 877 So.2d 912 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We have not addressed Gregg’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to raise this issue, leaving it to be raised by a motion for post-conviction relief. As to other issues raised, we find no reversible error or abuse of discretion.

FARMER, C.J., STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Gregg v. State, 900 So. 2d 758, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6525, 2005 WL 1026738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

900 So. 2d 758 (Gregg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related