Gregg v. McDaniel

Superior Court of Delaware

Gregg v. McDaniel

4 Del. 367

DecidedJuly 1, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Del. 367 (Gregg v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gregg v. McDaniel, 4 Del. 367 (Del. Ct. App. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

on motion, and after argument, set the verdict aside, and granted a new trial, on the ground that intoxicating liquor had been introduced into the jury room and used, pending their deliberations.

Rodney, R. H. Bayard and Whitely, for plaintiff. Gray and J. A. Bayard, for defendant.

In the argument of this motion, the following authorities were cited: 1 Burr. Rep. 393; 1 Wm. Blac. 348; 7 Cowen Rep. 362; 4 Ibid 31-6; 2 Tidd Pr. 814-15-16; Bac. Abr. Verd. H. 8, 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

on motion, and after argument, set the verdict aside, and granted a new trial, on the ground that intoxicating liquor had been introduced into the jury room and used, pending their deliberations.

Rodney, R. H. Bayard and Whitely, for plaintiff. Gray and J. A. Bayard, for defendant.

In the argument of this motion, the following authorities were cited: 1 Burr. Rep. 393; 1 Wm. Blac. 348; 7 Cowen Rep. 362; 4 Ibid 31-6; 2 Tidd Pr. 814-15-16; Bac. Abr. Verd. H. 8, 11.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Del. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregg-v-mcdaniel-delsuperct-1846.