Gregg v. Fontainebleau Hotel

Supreme Court of Florida

Gregg v. Fontainebleau Hotel

180 So. 2d 334, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2935

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 17, 1965

DocketNo. 34266

StatusPublished

This text of 180 So. 2d 334 (Gregg v. Fontainebleau Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gregg v. Fontainebleau Hotel, 180 So. 2d 334, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2935 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Alma Ruth Gregg, seeks review of an order of the Florida Industrial Commission vacating the order of the Deputy Commissioner and remanding the case with instructions to determine the percentage of acceleration or aggravation of claimant’s pre-existing disability or disc disease. The employer and carrier cross petition from the Commission’s affirmance of the Deputy Commissioner’s finding that the claimant’s average weekly wage is $100.

Our consideration of the petition, the cross petition, the record and the briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross petition are, therefore, denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TROW-BRIDGE, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Alma Ruth Gregg, seeks review of an order of the Florida Industrial Commission vacating the order of the Deputy Commissioner and remanding the case with instructions to determine the percentage of acceleration or aggravation of claimant’s pre-existing disability or disc disease. The employer and carrier cross petition from the Commission’s affirmance of the Deputy Commissioner’s finding that the claimant’s average weekly wage is $100.

Our consideration of the petition, the cross petition, the record and the briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross petition are, therefore, denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TROW-BRIDGE, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 So. 2d 334, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregg-v-fontainebleau-hotel-fla-1965.