Gregg v. English
This text of 38 Tex. 139 (Gregg v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think the verdict and judgment in this case right upon every principle of law and equity.
Grregg was in no condition to avoid his contract with • English.
It does not appear that time was of the essence of the contract. Ho doubt he could have brought suit and recovered on the notes at their maturity, but the time fixed for making the deed was-indefinite.
The deed was to be made after the patent issued, but the precise time in which it was to be made does not appear to have been fixed by the parties.
Grregg should at least have tendered a deed before he could rescind the contract.
English having tendered the purchase money into court, was entitled to specific performance, of the contract.
The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.
Aeeirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 Tex. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregg-v-english-tex-1873.