Greg C.'s Appeal from Probate

744 A.2d 914, 56 Conn. App. 439, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 32
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided January 25, 2000·No. AC 18392·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Greg C., appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his appeal from the judgment of the Probate Court for the district of Waterbury ordering the appointment of a conservator of his person and estate.

The Superior Court dismissed the appeal because it was not taken within the time required pursuant to General Statutes § 45a-187.1 Our examination of the record and briefs and consideration of the oral arguments of the parties persuades us that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

The issue of whether the appeal from probate was timely taken was properly resolved in the Superior Court’s thoughtful and comprehensive memorandum of decision. Greg C.’s Appeal from Probate, 46 Conn. Sup. 232, 744 A.2d 961 (1998). Because the memorandum of decision fully addresses the dispositive issue raised in [441] this appeal, we adopt it as a proper statement of the facts and the applicable law on that issue. It would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion contained therein. In re Karrlo K., 40 Conn. App. 73, 75, 668 A.2d 1353 (1996).

The judgment is affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greg C.'s Appeal from Probate, 744 A.2d 914, 56 Conn. App. 439, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 32 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

744 A.2d 914 (Greg C.'s Appeal from Probate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Porto v. Sullivan
987 A.2d 1092 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
Scott v. Salinas
749 A.2d 1228 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)
Greg C.'S Appeal from Probate
753 A.2d 936 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Paiva v. Probate Court, No. Fa98-0144267s (Apr. 14, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3927 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)