Greer v. Young

38 S.E. 314, 113 Ga. 120, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 175
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 27, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 38 S.E. 314 (Greer v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greer v. Young, 38 S.E. 314, 113 Ga. 120, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 175 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Little, J.

When in an action for land the right of the plaintiffs to recover is based on an alleged deed, which has been destroyed, and a copy of which can not he produced, the plaintiff must fail, unless the evidence not only satisfactorily shows the existence and loss of the original deed, but its contents and the fact of its proper execution. Smith v. Smith, 106 Ga. 303. Neither of the two last requisites was sufficiently shown to authorize a recovery in the present case, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

' Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pugh v. Moore
62 S.E.2d 153 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Stanaland v. Horne
158 S.E. 595 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Horne & Ponder v. O. B. & E. J. Evans
120 S.E. 787 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Griffin v. Wise
41 S.E. 1003 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.E. 314, 113 Ga. 120, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-young-ga-1901.