Greer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Greer v. State

342 S.W.3d 929, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 926, 2011 WL 2620430

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 5, 2011

DocketED 95438

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 S.W.3d 929 (Greer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greer v. State, 342 S.W.3d 929, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 926, 2011 WL 2620430 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Danny Greer appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-con *930 viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Danny Greer appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-con *930 viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 S.W.3d 929, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 926, 2011 WL 2620430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack