Greer v. . Shepherd

Superior Court of North Carolina

Greer v. . Shepherd

2 N.C. 96

DecidedApril 5, 1794

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.C. 96 (Greer v. . Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greer v. . Shepherd, 2 N.C. 96 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

There was a plea puis darrein continuance — that he had recovered in an action against another defendant, who was a party to the same trespass, and had judgment against him; and neither plaintiff nor defendant had witnesses now ready to prove the trespass, or that it was the same trespass for which damages had before been recovered. A plea pius darrien continuance is a waiver of all former pleas, and an admission of the declaration; and the defendant not being ready to prove his plea, plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for one penny.

See McDaniel v. Tate, post, 453.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There was a plea puis darrein continuance — that he had recovered in an action against another defendant, who was a party to the same trespass, and had judgment against him; and neither plaintiff nor defendant had witnesses now ready to prove the trespass, or that it was the same trespass for which damages had before been recovered. A plea pius darrien continuance is a waiver of all former pleas, and an admission of the declaration; and the defendant not being ready to prove his plea, plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for one penny.

See McDaniel v. Tate, post, 453.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.C. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-shepherd-ncsuperct-1794.