Greer v. Meritor

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedSeptember 15, 2011
DocketI.C. NOS. 268070 897988.
StatusPublished

This text of Greer v. Meritor (Greer v. Meritor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greer v. Meritor, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2011).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, the Full Commission finds no good grounds to receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their representatives. Upon reconsideration of the evidence, the Full Commission modifies the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as: *Page 2

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. Purolator Filters North America was insured at the time of the alleged January 2, 2008 injury and Travelers Insurance Company was the carrier on the risk.

3. On January 2, 2008, Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant, Purolator Filters North America, as a mechanic.

4. Plaintiff had a previously accepted Workers' Compensation injury to his neck on September 6, 2001. At that time, Plaintiff was employed by Arvin Meritor with the claim administered by Frank Gates Service Co. The Industrial Commission File Number in that claim is 268070.

5. After the hearing Defendant Purolator Filters NA/Travelers and Plaintiff stipulated to an average weekly wage of $1,028.03, yielding a compensation rate of $685.39.

6. At the hearing, the parties stipulated that a denied hernia claim, Industrial Commission File Number 637864, was not at issue in the present matter.

***********
EXHIBITS
The following documents were accepted into evidence as stipulated exhibits by the Deputy Commissioner:

* Exhibit 1: Pre-Trial Agreement, Industrial Commission Forms, Plaintiff's Medical Records, Plaintiff's Employment File and Discovery Responses;

* Exhibit 2: Plaintiff's May 20, 2005 Motion for Approval of Medical Treatment with Attachments and Corresponding Order; and

*Page 3

* Exhibit 3: Defendants Purolator Filters North American and Travelers Insurance Company's December 9, 2009 Motion regarding Mediator's Fees and December 15, 2009 Order by Deputy Commissioner John Schafer.

The following documents were accepted into evidence as Defendants Purolator Filters NA and Travelers Insurance Company's exhibits by the Deputy Commissioner:

* Exhibit 1: April 3, 2003 Motor Vehicle Accident Report.

***********
Based upon the preponderance of the evidence of the record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff is 48 years old. Plaintiff graduated from high school. Plaintiff is currently employed with Defendant-Employer Purolator Filters North America, as a mechanic AA.

2. On September 6, 2001, Plaintiff suffered injuries to his cervical spine while performing his work duties for Defendant-Employer Arvin Meritor. Defendants Arvin Meritor/The Frank Gates Service Co. accepted Plaintiff's injury and initiated medical and indemnity benefits. This injury was the subject of Industrial Commission File Number 268070.

3. An MRI performed on May 3, 2003, revealed spondylitic changes with a broad based disc bulge, osteophyte complex and central disc protrusion which effaced the cord and contributed to mild central canal stenosis. Subsequently, Plaintiff developed pain in his right shoulder, which was diagnosed as a torn rotator cuff. *Page 4

4. On October 13, 2003, Dr. W. Alexander Huff, an orthopedic surgeon, performed a diagnostic and operative arthroscopy on Plaintiff right shoulder and placed Plaintiff on light duty restrictions after the surgery.

5. On January 16, 2004, Plaintiff presented to Dr. William F. Lestini, an orthopedic surgeon, with cervical and thoracic complaints. Dr. Lestini continued the light duty restrictions, with no lifting over 15 pounds and no overhead work until further evaluation.

6. After undergoing a myelogram, Plaintiff returned to Dr. Lestini on March 16, 2004. Dr. Lestini opined that Plaintiff's main problems were a myofascial thoracic strain and right shoulder pain following the surgery. Dr. Lestini released Plaintiff to return to regular duty.

7. On June 22, 2004, the North Carolina Industrial Commission approved a Form 21 Agreement for Compensation for Disability for Plaintiff and the self-insured Defendant-Employer, Arvin Meritor, for a 15% permanent partial disability rating to Plaintiff's right shoulder, as assigned by Dr. Huff. Defendant continued to provide ongoing medical treatment for Plaintiff's neck condition.

8. On April 25, 2005, Plaintiff's counsel contacted the self-insured Defendant-Employer, Arvin Meritor, requesting authorization of additional treatment with Dr. Lestini. That request was denied, and Plaintiff's counsel filed a Motion for AdditionalMedical Treatment on May 20, 2005. The Industrial Commission approved Plaintiff's Motion by Order dated July 12, 2005, which required the self-insured Defendant-Employer, Arvin Meritor, to authorize and pay for recommended treatment by Dr. Lestini. Defendants Arvin Meritor/The Frank Gates Service Co. have continued to provide medical treatment since that time.

9. On October 19, 2005, Plaintiff returned to Dr. Lestini for neck pain that occurred with increased activity and some left arm pain with tingling and numbness in the small, ring and *Page 5 middle fingers of the left hand. Dr. Lestini ordered an EMG, nerve conduction study, and physical therapy.

10. On November 17, 2005, Plaintiff again presented to Dr. Lestini, with complaints of neck pain, headaches and a sign of nerve impingement. A subsequent nerve conduction study did not reveal any radiculopathy from the neck. Dr. Lestini offered Plaintiff the option of elective surgery, a return to work without restrictions, or a modification of work activities with a five percent (5%) disability rating. Plaintiff elected to return to full duty work with Defendant-Employer.

11. On April 20, 2006, Plaintiff returned to Dr. Lestini after undergoing a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE), which demonstrated that Plaintiff could perform heavy duty work. Although Plaintiff reported persistent neck pain, Dr. Lestini advised Plaintiff to avoid surgery, if possible. Dr. Lestini released Plaintiff to return to work without restrictions and no disability rating unless Plaintiff's pain became intolerable. If that occurred, Dr. Lestini's medical records reflect that he would place Plaintiff on restrictions of no lifting greater than 30 pounds and assign a 5% disability rating.

12. On December 11, 2007, Plaintiff again presented to Dr. Lestini, with complaints of neck pain and left upper extremity discomfort that had become "somewhat intolerable." Until this time, Plaintiff had continued to work without restrictions. Although Plaintiff discussed treatment options with Dr. Lestini, neither he nor Dr. Lestini decided whether the surgery was necessary. Dr. Lestini ordered an MRI and EMG and released Plaintiff to return to full duty work with no restrictions. *Page 6

13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2(19)
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-31
North Carolina § 97-31(23)
§ 97-42
North Carolina § 97-42
§ 97-47
North Carolina § 97-47
§ 97-90
North Carolina § 97-90

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Greer v. Meritor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-meritor-ncworkcompcom-2011.