Greer v. Masters

675 F. App'x 393
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 8, 2017
DocketNo. 16-7109
StatusPublished

This text of 675 F. App'x 393 (Greer v. Masters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greer v. Masters, 675 F. App'x 393 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Felix Greer, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend its judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible' error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Greer v. Masters, No. 1:15—cv-11735, 2016 WL 1103949 (S.D. W. Va. Feb. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 F. App'x 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-masters-ca4-2017.