Greer v. Joyce

210 S.W. 344, 138 Ark. 98, 1919 Ark. LEXIS 12
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 17, 1919
StatusPublished

This text of 210 S.W. 344 (Greer v. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greer v. Joyce, 210 S.W. 344, 138 Ark. 98, 1919 Ark. LEXIS 12 (Ark. 1919).

Opinion

WOOD, J.

The appellant filed an account in the justice court against the appellee for the sum of $26. Service was had upon the appellee and judgment was rendered against him by default.

Appellee appealed to the circuit court. There he filed a set-off in the sum of $50. Appellant moved to strike the set-off, which was overruled. Appellant duly saved exceptions to the ruling.

The appellee admitted that he owed the amount sued for but contended that the amount was set off by his claim and that appellant was due him a balance of $24. The cause was sent to the jury, and a verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the appellee in the sum of $24. This appeal is duly prosecuted.

The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to strike the set-off. ‘ ‘ Set-offs not presented in the justice court cannot be allowed on appeal in the circuit court. Kirby’s Digest, section 4682; Texas & St. L. R. Co. v. Hall, 44 Ark. 375; St. L., I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Richter, 48 Ark. 349; 3rd Crawford’s Digest, 3101. See also Woolverton v. Freeman, 77 Ark. 234; Chicago, R. I. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Young, 85 Ark. 444; Hinds v. Stevens, 90 Ark. 518.

For the error indicated, the judgment is, therefore, reversed. As the appellee admits that he is due appellant the amount claimed, it follows that judgment must be entered here for that sum and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Texas & St. Louis Railway v. Hall
44 Ark. 375 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1884)
St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Richter
48 Ark. 349 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)
Woolverton v. Freeman
91 S.W. 190 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1905)
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Young
108 S.W. 831 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)
Hines v. Stephens
119 S.W. 664 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 S.W. 344, 138 Ark. 98, 1919 Ark. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-joyce-ark-1919.