Greer v. Holdridge

13 S.E. 108, 86 Ga. 791, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 69
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 16, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 S.E. 108 (Greer v. Holdridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greer v. Holdridge, 13 S.E. 108, 86 Ga. 791, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 69 (Ga. 1891).

Opinion

Simmons, Justice.

The bill of exceptions in this case was certified by the trial judge on the 14th of April, 1890; it was seiwed upon the opposite party on April 28th, 1890, and filed in the clerk’s office May 3d, 1890. When the case was [792]*792called here, a motion to dismiss it was made upon the ground that the bill of exceptions was not served upon opposite counsel within ten days after the certificate was signed by the judge, or filed with the clerk within fifteen days thereafter, as the law requires. In reply to this, counsel for the plaintiff in error read an additional certificate of the judge who tried the case, dated April 30, 1890, wherein he certifies that it was his fault in not returning the bill of exceptions to counsel for plaintiff in error within the proper time after he had signed it; that through the neglect of his office boy, the bill of exceptions was not mailed, and it was not the fault of counsel for plaintiff in error that service was not perfected in time.

We have held up this caseto the present time in order to consider whether we could receive and act on this certificate or not. After a careful consideration of the matter, we have come to the conclusion that the statute does not authorize the trial judge to sign but one certificate, and that certificate is the one provided for by law. After he has once signed and certified a bill of exceptions, his power and jurisdiction over the case cease, and we know of no law which would permit us to receive and act on a second certificate, although that certificate relieves counsel for the plaintiff in error from any charge of laches or negligence in failing to have the bill of exceptions served and filed in time.

We therefore dismiss this writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beavers v. Lesueur
12 S.E.2d 583 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Brown Tire Co.
168 S.E. 75 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Crum
56 S.E. 242 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 S.E. 108, 86 Ga. 791, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-holdridge-ga-1891.