Greer v. Greer

637 So. 2d 381, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5557, 1994 WL 246508
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 8, 1994·No. No. 93-1784·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order which found appellant in contempt and directed him to pay back alimony plus attorney’s fees or be incarcerated. We affirm the trial court’s order except as to the attorney’s fees which we reverse and remand solely because of the trial court’s failure to set forth the specific findings required by Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), modified on other grounds by Standard Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla.1990); Underwood v. Elliott, 601 So.2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Jones v. Jones, 629 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., and ALVAREZ, RONALD V., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greer v. Greer, 637 So. 2d 381, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5557, 1994 WL 246508 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

637 So. 2d 381 (Greer v. Greer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guardian. of Halpert v. Rosenbloom, Pa
698 So. 2d 938 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)