Greer v. Greer
This text of 624 So. 2d 1076 (Greer v. Greer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a post-divorce case.
From the scant record, it appears that the father appeals from an order denying his requested modification of the visitation provisions of a divorce judgment. The record contains neither a transcript of the hearing nor an evidentiary statement pursuant to Rule 10, A.R.App.P. Further, antithetic to the rules and case law, the father attempts to supply factual information and to broaden the record in his brief.
An appellate court does not presume error; the appellant has the affirmative duty of showing error. Perkins v. Perkins,
The father simply fails to provide this court with anything to review on appeal; therefore, this case is affirmed. The mother's request for sanctions pursuant to Rule 38, A.R.App.P. is denied; however, she is granted $250 for an attorney's fee for this appeal.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
624 So. 2d 1076, 1993 WL 153951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-greer-alacivapp-1993.