Greer v. . Critcher
164 S.E. 343, 202 N.C. 857, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 287
Opinion
On controverted issues of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the plaintiff. The case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the principles of law applicable so far as appellant is concerned. We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be uphéld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greer v. . Critcher, 164 S.E. 343, 202 N.C. 857, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 287 (N.C. 1932).
164 S.E. 343 (Greer v. . Critcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greensboro Morris Plan Co. v. Palmer
116 S.E. 261 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)