Greer v. . Critcher

164 S.E. 343, 202 N.C. 857, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 287
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.E. 343 (Greer v. . Critcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greer v. . Critcher, 164 S.E. 343, 202 N.C. 857, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 287 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

On controverted issues of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the plaintiff. The case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the principles of law applicable so far as appellant is concerned. We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be uphéld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greensboro Morris Plan Co. v. Palmer
116 S.E. 261 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E. 343, 202 N.C. 857, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-v-critcher-nc-1932.