Greer, Randolph Mansoor

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Greer, Randolph Mansoor

DecidedMarch 21, 2007

DocketWR-53,836-02

StatusPublished

This text of Greer, Randolph Mansoor (Greer, Randolph Mansoor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greer, Randolph Mansoor, (Tex. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-53,836-02 EX PARTE RANDOLF MONSOOR GREER

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE

NO. 602461-B IN THE 228^th DISTRICT COURT

HARRIS COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O R D E R

This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071 § 5.

In June 1992, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence in an unpublished opinion on direct appeal. Greer v. State, No.

71,533 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 1994). Relief was denied on applicant's initial application by written order dated November 27, 2002.

In a single allegation, applicant contends that newly-discovered evidence of serious protocol problems in the handling and preserving of DNA evidence at the Houston Police Department crime lab reveals that the State destroyed evidence that could have rebutted the claim that applicant's blood was at the crime scene. By written order dated September 14, 2005, this Court remanded to the trial court to hold a live evidentiary hearing on the issue.

On remand, although the trial court did not hold a live evidentiary hearing, it received numerous inventory affidavits, and ordered DNA testing of evidence preserved from the crime scene and of applicant's blood and saliva. Based on the results of the DNA tests, the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law determining that a live hearing was not necessary and recommending that relief be denied. This Court has reviewed the record. We adopt the trial judge's findings and conclusions. Based upon the trial court's findings and conclusions and our own review, the relief sought is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 21^st DAY OF MARCH , 2007.

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-53,836-02 EX PARTE RANDOLF MONSOOR GREER

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE

NO. 602461-B IN THE 228^th DISTRICT COURT

HARRIS COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O R D E R

This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071 § 5.

In June 1992, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence in an unpublished opinion on direct appeal. Greer v. State, No.

71,533 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 1994). Relief was denied on applicant's initial application by written order dated November 27, 2002.

In a single allegation, applicant contends that newly-discovered evidence of serious protocol problems in the handling and preserving of DNA evidence at the Houston Police Department crime lab reveals that the State destroyed evidence that could have rebutted the claim that applicant's blood was at the crime scene. By written order dated September 14, 2005, this Court remanded to the trial court to hold a live evidentiary hearing on the issue.

On remand, although the trial court did not hold a live evidentiary hearing, it received numerous inventory affidavits, and ordered DNA testing of evidence preserved from the crime scene and of applicant's blood and saliva. Based on the results of the DNA tests, the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law determining that a live hearing was not necessary and recommending that relief be denied. This Court has reviewed the record. We adopt the trial judge's findings and conclusions. Based upon the trial court's findings and conclusions and our own review, the relief sought is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 21^st DAY OF MARCH , 2007.

Do Not Publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Greer, Randolph Mansoor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greer-randolph-mansoor-texcrimapp-2007.