Greenwood v. Watts

1 White & W. 46
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 2, 1881
DocketNo. 1112, Op. Book No. 3, p. 442
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 46 (Greenwood v. Watts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenwood v. Watts, 1 White & W. 46 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 114. Discontinuance. If a plaintiff does not insist upon service of citation upon one of several defendants in the court below, but proceeds to trial against the other defendants, it will be considered as a discontinuance of-the suit as to the defendant not served. [Houston v. Ward, 8 Tex. 124; Burton v. Varnell, 5 Tex. 139.]

§ 115. Where there is no statement of facts. In the absence of a statement of facts in the record, the appellate court will presume that whatever facts are necessary to support the judgment of the court below were ¡iroved on the trial.

§ 116. Jurisdiction; county court has none to remove eloucl from title to land. The county court has no jurisdiction of a suit to remove cloud from title to land.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burton v. Varnell
5 Tex. 139 (Texas Supreme Court, 1849)
Houston v. Ward
8 Tex. 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 1852)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwood-v-watts-texapp-1881.