Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister

Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister

662 N.E.2d 22, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1204, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 326
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 6, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2209
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 662 N.E.2d 22 (Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, 662 N.E.2d 22, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1204, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 326 (Ohio 1996).

Opinions

[1205]*1205The cause is before the court on a motion for discretionary appeal. The motion is denied.

Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent separately. Douglas, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardinal Health, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA
S.D. Ohio, 2021
Roe v. Heap, Unpublished Decision (5-11-2004)
2004 Ohio 2504 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
David v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
665 N.E.2d 1171 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
662 N.E.2d 22, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1204, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwood-v-taft-stettinius-hollister-ohio-1996.