Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister

Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister

662 N.E.2d 22, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1204, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 326
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 6, 1996·No. No. 95-2209·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

[1205] The cause is before the court on a motion for discretionary appeal. The motion is denied.

Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent separately. Douglas, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, 662 N.E.2d 22, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1204, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 326 (Ohio 1996).

662 N.E.2d 22 (Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cardinal Health, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA
S.D. Ohio, 2021
Roe v. Heap, Unpublished Decision (5-11-2004)
2004 Ohio 2504 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
David v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
665 N.E.2d 1171 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)