Greenwood v. State

168 S.W. 100, 74 Tex. Crim. 455, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 342
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 17, 1914
DocketNo. 3173.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 168 S.W. 100 (Greenwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenwood v. State, 168 S.W. 100, 74 Tex. Crim. 455, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 342 (Tex. 1914).

Opinion

HAEPEE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape on a girl under fifteen years of age, and his punishment assessed at seven years confinement in the State penitentiary.

The only bill of exceptions in the record complains that after the State had made its opening argument, and during the time defendant’s counsel was speaking, the court permitted State’s counsel to recall the prosecuting witness and prove that she was not the wife of defendant. In this there was no error as our Criminal Procedure provides that the court may permit evidence to be introduced at any time prior to the completion of the argument if he deems it necessary to the due administration of justice.

The charge fairly submits the issues and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. State
260 S.W. 875 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Mandosa v. State
255 S.W. 169 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.W. 100, 74 Tex. Crim. 455, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwood-v-state-texcrimapp-1914.