Greenwood v. State
34 Tex. 334
Opinion
A grand juror of the panel who found a bill is not a competent person to. try the case.
When an appeal is taken from the judgment of the district eourt, the sentence should await the mandate of thé Supreme Court-
A new trial should have been granted, when it was made' to appear that one of the grand jurors who found the bill had sat tipom the traverse jury who tried the defendant.
The judgment of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed, and remanded..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greenwood v. State, 34 Tex. 334 (Tex. 1871).
34 Tex. 334 (Greenwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holman v. State
171 S.W. 107 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1914)