Greenwood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Greenwood v. State

504 S.W.3d 67, 2016 WL 2894699, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 499

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 2016·No. ED 103195·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanford Greenwood (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief, motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. . We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential valué. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanford Greenwood (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief, motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. . We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential valué. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Greenwood v. State, 504 S.W.3d 67, 2016 WL 2894699, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

504 S.W.3d 67 (Greenwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.