Greenwood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Greenwood v. State

504 S.W.3d 67, 2016 WL 2894699, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 499

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 2016

DocketED 103195

StatusPublished

This text of 504 S.W.3d 67 (Greenwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenwood v. State, 504 S.W.3d 67, 2016 WL 2894699, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanford Greenwood (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief, motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. . We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential valué. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanford Greenwood (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief, motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. . We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential valué. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 S.W.3d 67, 2016 WL 2894699, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwood-v-state-moctapp-2016.