Greenwood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Greenwood v. State

254 S.W.3d 926, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 936, 2008 WL 2414930

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 17, 2008

DocketWD 68252

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 S.W.3d 926 (Greenwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenwood v. State, 254 S.W.3d 926, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 936, 2008 WL 2414930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Greenwood appeals the denial after a hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Greenwood appeals the denial after a hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 S.W.3d 926, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 936, 2008 WL 2414930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwood-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack