Greenwood v. State
254 S.W.3d 926, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 936, 2008 WL 2414930
Opinion
ORDER
Arthur Greenwood appeals the denial after a hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greenwood v. State, 254 S.W.3d 926, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 936, 2008 WL 2414930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
254 S.W.3d 926 (Greenwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stanley v. State
254 S.W.3d 926 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)