Greenwood v. Mangini
42 A.3d 295, 615 Pa. 780
Opinion
KRISTINA GREENWOOD AND LYNN GREENWOOD, H/W, Petitioners,
v.
FRANCIS R. MANGINI, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCIS MANGINI A/K/A FRANK MANGINI, SR. AND FRANCIS R. MANGINI, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HELEN V. MANGINI A/K/A HELEN MANGINI AND FRANCIS R. MANGINI AND DANIEL MANGINI, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM PATRICK MANGINI A/K/A EMILIO MANGINI AND DANIEL MANGINI, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MOLLIE MANGINI A/K/A MOLLIE NARDUCCI AND DANIEL MANGINI AND DOROTHY BOYLE, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER MANGINI AND DOROTHY BOYLE, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF ROSE KWASIZUR AND DOROTHY BOYLE AND CITY OF PHILADELPHIA C/O LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND A&E CONSTRUCTION, INC. AND BOILERHOUSE, LLC AND BOILERHOUSE DEVELOPMENT, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greenwood v. Mangini, 42 A.3d 295, 615 Pa. 780 (Pa. 2012).
42 A.3d 295 (Greenwood v. Mangini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.