Greenwood v. Callahan

111 Mass. 298
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The only question which comes before ns is whether the instruction asked for should have been given. We think it was rightly refused.

Highways are made, not merely for travel, but for such business as may be connected with it. Horses and vehicles may not only be driven along the street, but may be, in proper cases, left standing in it, for a reasonable time, being properly cared for, and a fastening may be sufficient for this purpose. It was not, as matter of law, negligent to leave the plaintiffs’ horse and wagon as it was left, and for the purpose stated, provided the plaintiffs used ordinary care. Steele v. BurhTiardt, 104 Mass. 59, and cases there cited. It was properly left to the jury to decide, under instructions, whether the plaintiffs had used ordinary care, taking into consideration all the facts proved.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenwood v. Callahan, 111 Mass. 298 (Mass. 1873).

111 Mass. 298 (Greenwood v. Callahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ahern v. Concord
132 A. 570 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1926)
Maguire v. American Railway Express Co.
129 N.E. 439 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Prieur v. E. H. Stafford Co.
85 N.W. 469 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Goodwin
111 Ill. 273 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1884)