Greenwich Savirgs Bank v. Silverman
This text of 153 A.D. 883 (Greenwich Savirgs Bank v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A receiver of the rents and profits of mortgaged premises cannot resold to contempt proceedings to compel tenants of the owner to pay rent. (American Mortgage Company v. Sire, 103 App. Div. 396; Guerrier v. Coleman, 135 id. 46.) As the order appealed from can serve no purpose except to lay the foundation for contempt proceedings, it is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Miller and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 A.D. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwich-savirgs-bank-v-silverman-nyappdiv-1912.