Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman

138 N.Y.S. 13

This text of 138 N.Y.S. 13 (Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman, 138 N.Y.S. 13 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A receiver of the rents and profits of mortgaged premises ca'nnot resort to contempt proceedings to compel tenants of the owner to pay rent. American Mortgage Co. v. Sire, 103 App. Div. 396, 92 N. Y. Supp. 1082; Guerrier v. Coleman, 135 App. Div. 46, 119 N. Y. Supp. 895.

As the order appealed from can serve no purpose, except to lay the foundation for contempt proceedings, it is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Mortgage Co. v. Sire
103 A.D. 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Guerrier v. Coleman
135 A.D. 46 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
American Mortgage Co. v. Sire
92 N.Y.S. 1082 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 N.Y.S. 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwich-savings-bank-v-silverman-nyappdiv-1912.