Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman
138 N.Y.S. 13
Opinion
A receiver of the rents and profits of mortgaged premises ca'nnot resort to contempt proceedings to compel tenants of the owner to pay rent. American Mortgage Co. v. Sire, 103 App. Div. 396, 92 N. Y. Supp. 1082; Guerrier v. Coleman, 135 App. Div. 46, 119 N. Y. Supp. 895.
As the order appealed from can serve no purpose, except to lay the foundation for contempt proceedings, it is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman, 138 N.Y.S. 13 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
138 N.Y.S. 13 (Greenwich Savings Bank v. Silverman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Mortgage Co. v. Sire
103 A.D. 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Guerrier v. Coleman
135 A.D. 46 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
American Mortgage Co. v. Sire
92 N.Y.S. 1082 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)