Greenwich Savings Bank v. Jones
This text of 201 S.E.2d 244 (Greenwich Savings Bank v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action by plaintiff bank to foreclose a mortgage on real .estate. The respondent Mary E. Jones and Leon Jones, now deceased, were the mortgagors. The appellant United American Life Insurance Company was made a party because of the issuance by it of a credit life insurance policy upon the life of the said Leon Jones, which policy United contends was duly cancelled by it prior to the death of Leon Jones.
Appellant United appeals from an order of the lower court denying its motion for summary judgment made pursuant to Circuit Court Rule 44. This Court having adopted the general rule that an order denying a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory decision which is not directly appealable, Geiger v. Carolina Pool Equipment Distributors, Inc., 257 S. C. 112, 184 S. E. (2d) 446, the appellant has petitioned for leave to argue against said decision and has urged this Court to either overrule or modify the same.
We have carefully considered the briefs and argument of the appellant and are not presently convinced that we should *517 either modify or overrule said decision. The appeal is, accordingly,
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 S.E.2d 244, 261 S.C. 515, 1973 S.C. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwich-savings-bank-v-jones-sc-1973.