Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford

166 N.E. 334, 250 N.Y. 587, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 979
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Only one return was filed in this court, and that was in the case of the Greenwich Bank against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn., and others. Consequently, the jurisdiction of this court extends to this case and no other. The agreement which the parties made to the effect that the other cases should abide the decision in the Greenwich Bank case is a matter between themselves and the Supreme Court. If the county clerk refuses to enter judgment upon the consent of the attorneys, relief must be sought in the Supreme Court, not here; if counsel desires to be relieved fropi the stipulation as to the entry of judgments, he must seek relief in the Supreme Court. The motion to amend our remittitur, therefore, and to hand down remittiturs in the other eight cases, is denied.

Motion for reargument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, 166 N.E. 334, 250 N.Y. 587, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 979 (N.Y. 1929).

166 N.E. 334 (Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related