Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford

New York Court of Appeals

Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford

166 N.E. 334, 250 N.Y. 587, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 979

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 N.E. 334 (Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, 166 N.E. 334, 250 N.Y. 587, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 979 (N.Y. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Only one return was filed in this court, and that was in the case of the Greenwich Bank against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn., and others. Consequently, the jurisdiction of this court extends to this case and no other. The agreement which the parties made to the effect that the other cases should abide the decision in the Greenwich Bank case is a matter between themselves and the Supreme Court. If the county clerk refuses to enter judgment upon the consent of the attorneys, relief must be sought in the Supreme Court, not here; if counsel desires to be relieved fropi the stipulation as to the entry of judgments, he must seek relief in the Supreme Court. The motion to amend our remittitur, therefore, and to hand down remittiturs in the other eight cases, is denied.

Motion for reargument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Only one return was filed in this court, and that was in the case of the Greenwich Bank against the Hartford Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn., and others. Consequently, the jurisdiction of this court extends to this case and no other. The agreement which the parties made to the effect that the other cases should abide the decision in the Greenwich Bank case is a matter between themselves and the Supreme Court. If the county clerk refuses to enter judgment upon the consent of the attorneys, relief must be sought in the Supreme Court, not here; if counsel desires to be relieved fropi the stipulation as to the entry of judgments, he must seek relief in the Supreme Court. The motion to amend our remittitur, therefore, and to hand down remittiturs in the other eight cases, is denied.

Motion for reargument denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 N.E. 334, 250 N.Y. 587, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwich-bank-v-hartford-fire-ins-co-of-hartford-ny-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack