Greenwell v. Botelor
This text of 10 F. Cas. 1183 (Greenwell v. Botelor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Couet (MoRsell, J., contra,) ordered the property to be returned to the defendant, being satisfied by evidence that the property, at the time of the defendant’s taking it, belonged to the said Joseph W. Greenwell, and not to the plaintiff, and that the possession was not first in the plaintiff, and was not obtained by the defendant forcibly or fraudulently. (See the Maryland Act of 1785, c. 80, § 14.)
Morsell, J. thought that the Act of Assembly of Maryland was intended only to aid the real owner of the goods, and not an officer serving an execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F. Cas. 1183, 3 D.C. 7, 3 Cranch 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwell-v-botelor-circtddc-1826.