Greenwell v. Bellsouth Telecommunications

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Greenwell v. Bellsouth Telecommunications

732 So. 2d 333, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12448, 1998 WL 689691

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 7, 1998

DocketNo. 97-3431

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 732 So. 2d 333 (Greenwell v. Bellsouth Telecommunications) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenwell v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, 732 So. 2d 333, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12448, 1998 WL 689691 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from-an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (hereinafter JCC) denying Claimant permanent and temporary workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant raises several issues on appeal, the first of which is whether the JCC erred in entering a stale order. We reverse and remand for a new hearing because Claimant’s credibility was critical to the outcome of the case, and there was an excessive delay between Claimant’s live testimony and the entry of the final order. See Palmieri v. NAACO, 677 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We therefore do not reach the remaining issues raised by Claimant.

REVERSED and REMANDED for a new hearing.

ERVIN, BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from-an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (hereinafter JCC) denying Claimant permanent and temporary workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant raises several issues on appeal, the first of which is whether the JCC erred in entering a stale order. We reverse and remand for a new hearing because Claimant’s credibility was critical to the outcome of the case, and there was an excessive delay between Claimant’s live testimony and the entry of the final order. See Palmieri v. NAACO, 677 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We therefore do not reach the remaining issues raised by Claimant.

REVERSED and REMANDED for a new hearing.

ERVIN, BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 So. 2d 333, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12448, 1998 WL 689691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwell-v-bellsouth-telecommunications-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack