Greenway v. Dare

6 N.J.L. 372
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 15, 1796·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Every scire facias is a new and independent action, referring to the former proceedings, but wholly distinct from them.* This writ of error can legally remove nothing but the record in the original suit; everything else, from the issuing of the scire facias to the judgment upon it, comes before us in a manner which excludes it from our consideration ; it is coram non judice. We think that we have no jurisdiction over the record and proceedings in this second suit, and if so, no consent or admission will confer jurisdiction. You must confine yourself to the errors, if any in the first suit.

Judgment was affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenway v. Dare, 6 N.J.L. 372 (N.J. 1796).

6 N.J.L. 372 (Greenway v. Dare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonnigal v. Smith
6 Johns. 106 (New York Supreme Court, 1810)