Greenwald v. Petite Cigar Mfg. Co.

101 N.Y.S. 86

• Court: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
• Decided: November 14, 1906
• Status: Published

Opinion

DOWLING, J.

Plaintiffs sue to recover the sum of $194, claimed to be due from defendant, a corporation, as the agreed purchase price of 97,000 cigar bands and labels. Upon the trial it was sought to establish defendant’s liability byproving a contract madebetween plaintiff’s salesman, one Leo Schwab, and defendant’s manager, one Aaron Rider. But the evidence showed that, so far from said manager having made a contract for the purchase of these labels and bands, when Schwab called upon him to urge the purchase thereof, he was referred to one Harry Rothschild by Rider, who, in so referring him, said that the purchase of such goods was not in his department. It is true that he also said, “Anything Rothschild says about this is all right.” Rothschild is claimed to have said to Schwab, after inspecting samples of the labels and bands, that they were an excellent band and he would take them. But Harry Rothschild, by the admission of plaintiffs’ own witness, was not employed about defendant’s premises, and it affirmatively appears that he was not at any time an officer of defendant corporation. He had no power whatever to bind defendant in any way.

The plaintiffs have failed to prove any sale to defendant, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

GILDERSLEEVE, J., concurs. DUGRO, J., concurs in result.