Greenwald v. Lack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenwald v. Lack

276 A.D.2d 261, 714 N.Y.S.2d 204, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 3, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 261 (Greenwald v. Lack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenwald v. Lack, 276 A.D.2d 261, 714 N.Y.S.2d 204, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about December 22, 1999, which denied the motion of defendant landlord Rudolph and the cross motion of defendant tenant Lack for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The infant plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when he lost his footing on a metal grated terrace floor and slid into a weathervane placed upon the terrace by defendant tenant. The record raises issues of fact as to whether the terrace floor was dangerously slippery and as to whether the weathervane was hazardously placed and, accordingly, defendants’ motions for summary judgment were properly denied. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about December 22, 1999, which denied the motion of defendant landlord Rudolph and the cross motion of defendant tenant Lack for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The infant plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when he lost his footing on a metal grated terrace floor and slid into a weathervane placed upon the terrace by defendant tenant. The record raises issues of fact as to whether the terrace floor was dangerously slippery and as to whether the weathervane was hazardously placed and, accordingly, defendants’ motions for summary judgment were properly denied. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 261, 714 N.Y.S.2d 204, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwald-v-lack-nyappdiv-2000.