Greenstone, Inc. v. D & L, L.L.C.

931 So. 2d 221, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9687, 2006 WL 1627868
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 2006·No. No. 1D06-2310·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Micale v. Polen, 487 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (citing Palmer v. Atkinson, 116 Fla. 366, 156 So. 726 (1934)) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus because the matter could readily be heard before another judge without undue prejudice to the parties even where the reasons set forth in a motion to disqualify a trial judge are inadequate).

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenstone, Inc. v. D & L, L.L.C., 931 So. 2d 221, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9687, 2006 WL 1627868 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

931 So. 2d 221 (Greenstone, Inc. v. D & L, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Micale v. Polen
487 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State Ex Rel. Palmer v. Atkinson
156 So. 726 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)