Greenspan v. Rodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenspan v. Rodman

45 A.D.2d 682, 356 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 A.D.2d 682 (Greenspan v. Rodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenspan v. Rodman, 45 A.D.2d 682, 356 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 6, 1972, granting plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on default against defendants, Global Maritime Leasing, Panama, Inc., and Global Transocean Carriers, Ltd., Inc., and for related relief, unanimously dismissed. Respondents shall recover of appellants one bill of $40 costs and disbursements of these appeals. Defendants-appellants, who are not aggrieved parties, lack standing to appeal from an order granting a default judgment against two other defendants who have failed to appear or answer the complaint herein and who failed to “ submit or appear ” in opposition to the motion below. Had we not dismissed this appeal, we would have affirmed. Concur — McGivern, P. J., Markewich, Steuer, Capozzoli and Macken, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 6, 1972, granting plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on default against defendants, Global Maritime Leasing, Panama, Inc., and Global Transocean Carriers, Ltd., Inc., and for related relief, unanimously dismissed. Respondents shall recover of appellants one bill of $40 costs and disbursements of these appeals. Defendants-appellants, who are not aggrieved parties, lack standing to appeal from an order granting a default judgment against two other defendants who have failed to appear or answer the complaint herein and who failed to “ submit or appear ” in opposition to the motion below. Had we not dismissed this appeal, we would have affirmed. Concur — McGivern, P. J., Markewich, Steuer, Capozzoli and Macken, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 682, 356 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenspan-v-rodman-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack